Einde inhoudsopgave
Directors' liability (IVOR nr. 101) 2017/2.4.1
2.4.1 Do senior directors fear directors’ liability risks?
mr. drs. N.T. Pham, datum 09-01-2017
- Datum
09-01-2017
- Auteur
mr. drs. N.T. Pham
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS398538:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Ondernemingsrecht / Rechtspersonenrecht
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
Participant 4, CFO.
The general assumption of this research is that individuals often fall prey to biases which prevent them from accurately calculating risks. Fischhoff et al. (1978, p. 127-152) introduced the psychometric paradigm to address the question of why people perceive a variety of hazards differently. The researchers found that dread was a major factor in risk perception.
Slovic & Peters 2006; Slovic et al. 2005; Slovic et al. 2000, p. 397-420.
Similar findings were found among physicians regarding malpractice claims (Charles et al. 1987, p. 462-466, 468; Charles 1991, p. 22-26; Martin et al. 1991, p. 1300-1304; Palacio 2008, p. 1032-1034).
It must be noted that two CEO’s in the study who, at the time of the interviews were the company’s owners, (co)founders or controlling shareholders tended to underestimate liability risks. They described a feeling of immunity to liability and a strong belief that liability risks can be prevented by ‘demonstrating good faith and honesty’ and by acting on ‘best knowledge’.
Loewenstein et al. (2001) found that people are very sensitive to high positive or negative consequences, regardless of their probability.
‘If you know how some directors are being treated, it’s not an extreme feeling to be on guard. The climate in the Netherlands is incredibly governed by populism, to the detriment of the person concerned and the company. To suppliers, to customers and to the people working for the company. I’mbeing constantly warned to watch out… lawyers, banks, supervisors, works council. They [a group of investors, TP] threatened me, to sue me.’1
It has long been assumed that emotions have a significant impact on how individuals perceive risks and act on them.2 Several empirical studies on risk and feelings show that feelings of fear influence an individuals’ perception and tolerance of risk. Feelings such as dread, stress and anxiety have proven to have an impact on an individual’s risk assessment and decision-making, which is also known as the ‘affect heuristic’ in literature.3
I found that the affect heuristic was also important in terms of how the directors under study perceived directors’ liability risks. Directors’ liability was strongly associated with a feeling of dread. It was described as unpredictable and uncontrollable and one of the most stressful and traumatic experiences.4 One important finding in my study is that a director’s perception of his or her liability risks is not just rational but also involves an affective element. This may cause divergence between perceived and actual liability risks. The majority of the directors tended to overestimate directors’ liability risks.5 Because the consequences of directors’ liability were exaggerated, the probability of their occurrence received little consideration.6 The interviews revealed the extent to which directors’ liability risks carry affective meaning and are strongly associated with negative outcomes, while disregarding risk level and the statistical probability of incurring actual liability. Directors of major companies may fear directors’ liability risks despite such risks being not well-founded, because their consequence may nevertheless be devastating.