Einde inhoudsopgave
Female representation at the corporate top (IVOR nr. 126) 2022/1.3.1
1.3.1 Theoretical lens
dr. mr. R.A. van ’t Foort-Diepeveen, datum 13-05-2022
- Datum
13-05-2022
- Auteur
dr. mr. R.A. van ’t Foort-Diepeveen
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS659183:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Ondernemingsrecht (V)
Ondernemingsrecht / Corporate governance
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
Calás & Smircich, in: Studying Organization: Theory & Method, 1999; Calás & Smircich, in: The SAGE handbook of organization studies, 2006; Benschop & Verloo, in: The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies, 2016.
Calás et al., Academy of Management Review, 2009, 34(3); Calás & Smircich, in: Studying Organization: Theory & Method, 1999.
Benschop & Verloo, in: The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies, 2016; Ely & Meyerson, Research in organizational behavior, 2000a, 22.
Calás & Smircich, in: Studying Organization: Theory & Method, 1999, p. 220; Calás & Smircich, in: The SAGE handbook of organization studies, 2006, p. 292.
Calás & Smircich, in: Studying Organization: Theory & Method, 1999; Calás & Smircich, in: The SAGE handbook of organization studies, 2006.
Calás & Smircich, in: The SAGE handbook of organization studies, 2006; Calás et al., Academy of Management Review, 2009, 34(3); Gherardi, in: The Oxford handbook of organization theory, 2005; Lorber, The variety of feminisms and their contributions to gender equality, 1997.
Calás et al., Academy of Management Review, 2009, 34(3).
Calás & Smircich, in: Studying Organization: Theory & Method, 1999; Calás & Smircich, in: The SAGE handbook of organization studies, 2006.
Calás & Smircich, in: The SAGE handbook of organization studies, 2006.
Calás & Smircich, in: The SAGE handbook of organization studies, 2006; Gherardi, in: The Oxford handbook of organization theory, 2005.
Calás & Smircich, in: The SAGE handbook of organization studies, 2006, p. 292.
Benschop & Verloo, in: The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies, 2016; Calás & Smircich, in: Studying Organization: Theory & Method, 1999; Gherardi, in: The Oxford handbook of organization theory, 2005.
Van ‘t Foort-Diepeveen et al., Gender in Management: An International Journal, 2021, 36(4), p. 466; van den Brink et al., Organization Studies, 2010, 31(11); Calás & Smircich, in: Studying Organization: Theory & Method, 1999; Calás et al., Academy of Management Review, 2009, 34(3); Ely & Meyerson, Research in organizational behavior, 2000a, 22; Ely & Meyerson, Organization, 2000b, 7(4); Meyerson & Kolb, Organization, 2000, 7(4); Nentwich, Gender, Work & Organization, 2006, 13(6).
Calás & Smircich, in: Studying Organization: Theory & Method, 1999; Gherardi, in: The Oxford handbook of organization theory, 2005.
Benschop & Verloo, in: The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies, 2016; Lorber, The variety of feminisms and their contributions to gender equality, 1997; Meyerson & Kolb, Organization, 2000, 7(4); Nentwich, Gender, Work & Organization, 2006, 13(6); Nienaber & Moraka, Acta Commercii, 2016, 16(2).
Meyerson & Kolb, Organization, 2000, 7(4); Nentwich, Gender, Work & Organization, 2006, 13(6).
Ely & Meyerson, Research in organizational behavior, 2000a, 22; Meyerson & Kolb, Organization, 2000, 7(4); Nentwich, Gender, Work & Organization, 2006, 13(6).
A liberal feminist lens was applied for conducting the research for this PhD research. Feminist theories combine organizational theory and women’s issues with a view to creating more gender equal organizations.1 Feminist theories are used to provide a critique on current and past situations of male domination and offer opportunities for revision by trying to induce change in organizations.2 The liberal feminism lens is among those feminist strands that are considered most influential in literature.3 The starting point of this research is that the underrepresentation and subordination of women are considered to be related to ‘individual problems’ of women and ‘structural errors’4 and that organizations are gender neutral.5 Furthermore, the liberal feminism’s point of departure is that women and men should have equal rights and that social arrangements that uphold discrimination should, therefore, be eradicated, e.g., through effective implementation of anti-discrimination legislation.6 Given the fact that these premises are acknowledged by liberal feminism, liberal feminism was chosen as the theoretical basis for this research.
The disadvantaged position of women in society is believed to be caused by the male-structuring of society.7 Liberal feminism views women’s problems as individual problems.8 As such, liberal feminism does not consider female oppression and the male dominated structuring of society to be a problem that lies within organizations.9 Organizations are seen as being ‘gender-neutral’10 and the problems women face are, therefore, not considered to be related to organizational problems, such as gendered practices within organizations. Liberal feminism
“assumes that the causes of barriers for women’s equality in organizations lie in individual limitations and structural errors. (…) attitudes, traditions and cultural norms still represent barriers to women’s access to higher status and higher paying positions in the workplace, despite legal sanctions against sex discrimination.”11
Liberal feminism is premised on the idea that women’s oppression can be ended by providing equal opportunities to women and men.12 Equal opportunities can be achieved by ‘removing structural barriers that discriminate against women’.13
Since liberal feminism advocates equal opportunities, proposed interventions to achieve equal opportunities for women and men do not require a radical restructuring of society.14 Governmental interventions that aim to provide equal opportunities to women and men are, for instance, affirmative action measures and the adoption of legislation that prohibits discrimination.15 Organizational interventions aimed at providing equal opportunities,16 include mentoring programs, transparent promotion procedures, and interventions to arrange work in such a way that it provides women and men the opportunity to work flexibly.17