Directors' liability
Einde inhoudsopgave
Directors' liability (IVOR nr. 101) 2017/2.4.2.0:2.4.2.0 Introductie
Directors' liability (IVOR nr. 101) 2017/2.4.2.0
2.4.2.0 Introductie
Documentgegevens:
mr. drs. N.T. Pham, datum 09-01-2017
- Datum
09-01-2017
- Auteur
mr. drs. N.T. Pham
- JCDI
JCDI:ADS398540:1
- Vakgebied(en)
Ondernemingsrecht / Rechtspersonenrecht
Toon alle voetnoten
Voetnoten
Voetnoten
Participant 42, supervisory director (chair).
Deze functie is alleen te gebruiken als je bent ingelogd.
The research results indicate that certain circumstances may cause directors to perceive directors’ liability as a serious threat and reason for engaging in defensive behaviour. These situations arise when a director is intensively exposed to public opinion and/or when litigation seems likely. Cases of fraud or bankruptcy were frequently mentioned as justification for defensive behaviour. Past difficulties with regard to directors’ liability also provoked concerns about future liability.Moreover, the research reveals that the public and personal consequences of a liability claim may have a far greater impact on a director than the financial consequences, as the latter are generally deemed to be avoidable by means of insurance. Consider the following:
‘Shareholders can easily threaten to damage your reputation. If you incur reputational damage, no one will hire you in the future. Financial risks are manageable and you have to manage them. If I tell my wife that I don’t mind to assume the financial risks. No way. Then I may as well quit everything I’m doing. You can’t cover reputational risks, but you can insure financial risks.’1